NewsPlusNotes Terms of Use
NewsPlusNotes is not affiliated with nor do we purport to represent
the views, interests, intentions, or policies of any park, corporation,
or entity. The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the
individual writers. While we strive to achieve 100% accuracy in our
news reporting, errors inevitably will occur from time to time and we
make no guarantees that the facts presented in any given post will
remain unchanged over time. For complete, up-to-the-minute information
on any park, please visit that park's web site or contact the park directly.
All original content found on NewsPlusNotes, including but not limited to
all original written content, the NewsPlusNotes logo and all other static
graphic and web design elements comprising the site, and all photos from
NewsPlusNotes writers' personal collections, is the exclusive property of
the NewsPlusNotes team and may not be used, reproduced, or distributed in
any manner without the express written consent of the individual author/creator.
All non-original content found on NewsPlusNotes, including but not limited
to park logos, press releases, and photo contributions received from parks,
corporations, and individual readers, remains the property of the original
author/creator and may be subject to additional copyright, trademark, and/or
intellectual property protection. The lack of an explicit copyright notice
does not imply ownership by NewsPlusNotes or any of its writers unless the
content in question has been produced by one of our team members as described
in the paragraph above. NewsPlusNotes occasionally features guest writers,
and these individuals retain ownership of all original written and/or graphic
content that they publish on NewsPlusNotes. By contributing written or graphic
material to NewsPlusNotes, you are implying that you are the owner of this
material or are submitting it with the express consent of the owner. If you
feel that we've made an error or omission in attributing proper credit to a
particular piece of content found on NewsPlusNotes, please contact us and we
will gladly investigate the matter and make any necessary corrections.
CLOSE
File this in the potential bummer category, according to this opinion piece out of the Santa Clara Weekly, Cedar Fair might have to delay plans to build the GCI wooden coaster at California's Great America in 2009.
3 comments:
Looks to me like Cedar Fair is looking for an excuse to wait a year till the dust on the stadium deal settles. It's a pretty smart move- a wood coaster is much more expensive to move than a steel coaster. Look at the fate of the Villain! It was a child compared to the age of other wood coasters.
I agree, better yet- put it up at Dorney. But where? Could always put in a parking structure and use the lot!
I think the wooden coaster has also been used to show that they'll invest in the park if they get what they want with the 49ers.
But if they really want to sell to the team then I can't imagine they'll still put in the ride. Why spend the cash?
Sounds terrific lets have it go to dorney. I think though that mr newsplusnotes is right. When else has Cedar Fair said they are going to build a ride and give the plans 2 years before the fact and prior to any work being done. Not to mention using a stock photo of renegade.
Post a Comment