NewsPlusNotes Terms of Use
NewsPlusNotes is not affiliated with nor do we purport to represent
the views, interests, intentions, or policies of any park, corporation,
or entity. The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the
individual writers. While we strive to achieve 100% accuracy in our
news reporting, errors inevitably will occur from time to time and we
make no guarantees that the facts presented in any given post will
remain unchanged over time. For complete, up-to-the-minute information
on any park, please visit that park's web site or contact the park directly.
All original content found on NewsPlusNotes, including but not limited to
all original written content, the NewsPlusNotes logo and all other static
graphic and web design elements comprising the site, and all photos from
NewsPlusNotes writers' personal collections, is the exclusive property of
the NewsPlusNotes team and may not be used, reproduced, or distributed in
any manner without the express written consent of the individual author/creator.
All non-original content found on NewsPlusNotes, including but not limited
to park logos, press releases, and photo contributions received from parks,
corporations, and individual readers, remains the property of the original
author/creator and may be subject to additional copyright, trademark, and/or
intellectual property protection. The lack of an explicit copyright notice
does not imply ownership by NewsPlusNotes or any of its writers unless the
content in question has been produced by one of our team members as described
in the paragraph above. NewsPlusNotes occasionally features guest writers,
and these individuals retain ownership of all original written and/or graphic
content that they publish on NewsPlusNotes. By contributing written or graphic
material to NewsPlusNotes, you are implying that you are the owner of this
material or are submitting it with the express consent of the owner. If you
feel that we've made an error or omission in attributing proper credit to a
particular piece of content found on NewsPlusNotes, please contact us and we
will gladly investigate the matter and make any necessary corrections.
CLOSE
3 comments:
I live in Louisville, and while SFKK is not a great park, I have always supported it and hoped for the best. For a while, we were really moving up under Jay Thomas as GM. Then we had that horrible accident and Jay is now working his magic at Magic Mountain, and it now seems the park is in decline, except maybe for the water park. Jay Thomas told me 2 years ago that 2008 would see a revamp of the part of the park they now have closed. I am not sure if that means they changed their minds, or they really do have something planned for that area that is new. I hope so. If they do not do anything new there, then I fear the park will either close or become a water park only. Time will tell, but I hope the place improves. It DOES have great potential....
I live in Nashville and Skff is the closest park we have. In the past the park was O.K. but now its getting old. Look at the Roller Coaster Timeline:
Starchaser 1987-1995
Thunder Run 1990-present
Vampire 1990-1999
T2 1995-present
Chang 1997-present
Twisted Twins 1998- did not run all 2008 season
Road Runner Express 2000-present
Greezed Lightning 2003-present
If you look at it the last major ride was 1998 (wild mouse and shuttle configuration do not count) but they have been expanding the waterpark which is o.K. but everytime I go I don't go to the waterpark. I wouldn't travl 200 miles to go to one when there is one 5 miles from me but six flags kentucky kingdom needs to either sell the park or try to expand. either one will work!
I live in New Jersey and work at Six Flags Great Adventure and I know that we are getting The Chang from SFKK. Having lived in KY before and been to SFKK, I assume if the park loses The Chang then its pretty much done for since this was the best ride the park had. It pretty sad, but Six Flags has filed for bankruptcy so it was bound to close a park eventually.
Post a Comment