NewsPlusNotes Terms of Use
NewsPlusNotes is not affiliated with nor do we purport to represent
the views, interests, intentions, or policies of any park, corporation,
or entity. The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the
individual writers. While we strive to achieve 100% accuracy in our
news reporting, errors inevitably will occur from time to time and we
make no guarantees that the facts presented in any given post will
remain unchanged over time. For complete, up-to-the-minute information
on any park, please visit that park's web site or contact the park directly.
All original content found on NewsPlusNotes, including but not limited to
all original written content, the NewsPlusNotes logo and all other static
graphic and web design elements comprising the site, and all photos from
NewsPlusNotes writers' personal collections, is the exclusive property of
the NewsPlusNotes team and may not be used, reproduced, or distributed in
any manner without the express written consent of the individual author/creator.
All non-original content found on NewsPlusNotes, including but not limited
to park logos, press releases, and photo contributions received from parks,
corporations, and individual readers, remains the property of the original
author/creator and may be subject to additional copyright, trademark, and/or
intellectual property protection. The lack of an explicit copyright notice
does not imply ownership by NewsPlusNotes or any of its writers unless the
content in question has been produced by one of our team members as described
in the paragraph above. NewsPlusNotes occasionally features guest writers,
and these individuals retain ownership of all original written and/or graphic
content that they publish on NewsPlusNotes. By contributing written or graphic
material to NewsPlusNotes, you are implying that you are the owner of this
material or are submitting it with the express consent of the owner. If you
feel that we've made an error or omission in attributing proper credit to a
particular piece of content found on NewsPlusNotes, please contact us and we
will gladly investigate the matter and make any necessary corrections.
CLOSE
Here's an article from MassLive.com about Six Flags New England that I think is really pretty hilarious. It's basically about how everyone in the local government wants to work with the park better in the future to make sure there's no repeat of the failed Dark Knight coaster - ever again.
8 comments:
Six Flags New England's property is right on the Massachusetts/Connecticut border. They even own some land in Connecticut. So moving into Connecticut wouldn't require physically moving; just a redrawing of some lines (albeit lines that wouldn't be easy to redraw).
Well that makes me feel dumb! Thanks for the info!
question, how do you find all of these stories? Do you go into Google news and put on email alerts for stories on parks?
I browse and browse and browse to find this stuff.
I've tried google news alerts but I find that they come too slowly. I used to find stories online and then Google would e-mail them the next day.
It's a lot of work to find the stuff but I love the industry...
That's really impressive, what is your career line by the way? I'd bet those skills come in handy.
Sadly I work in an industry that's almost the polar opposite of the amusement park scene. So surfing the web well isn't on my resume!
Any research involved?
Based on what I know getting building permits from State Govt took awfully long time w/pain. So the Dark Knight had to be scrapped for the year. But they still tried to make up for the attendance with some extra Six Flags Coupons for 2008 season.
Post a Comment