NewsPlusNotes Terms of Use
NewsPlusNotes is not affiliated with nor do we purport to represent
the views, interests, intentions, or policies of any park, corporation,
or entity. The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the
individual writers. While we strive to achieve 100% accuracy in our
news reporting, errors inevitably will occur from time to time and we
make no guarantees that the facts presented in any given post will
remain unchanged over time. For complete, up-to-the-minute information
on any park, please visit that park's web site or contact the park directly.
All original content found on NewsPlusNotes, including but not limited to
all original written content, the NewsPlusNotes logo and all other static
graphic and web design elements comprising the site, and all photos from
NewsPlusNotes writers' personal collections, is the exclusive property of
the NewsPlusNotes team and may not be used, reproduced, or distributed in
any manner without the express written consent of the individual author/creator.
All non-original content found on NewsPlusNotes, including but not limited
to park logos, press releases, and photo contributions received from parks,
corporations, and individual readers, remains the property of the original
author/creator and may be subject to additional copyright, trademark, and/or
intellectual property protection. The lack of an explicit copyright notice
does not imply ownership by NewsPlusNotes or any of its writers unless the
content in question has been produced by one of our team members as described
in the paragraph above. NewsPlusNotes occasionally features guest writers,
and these individuals retain ownership of all original written and/or graphic
content that they publish on NewsPlusNotes. By contributing written or graphic
material to NewsPlusNotes, you are implying that you are the owner of this
material or are submitting it with the express consent of the owner. If you
feel that we've made an error or omission in attributing proper credit to a
particular piece of content found on NewsPlusNotes, please contact us and we
will gladly investigate the matter and make any necessary corrections.
CLOSE
3 comments:
I hope cedar fair buys those millennium flyer trains.
I had an opportunity to visit Celebration City soon after it opened. I think it was just a few months old when I was there. I, regrettably, didn't take it. Oh well. I guess not every person can get to every amusement park.
I hope they pursue the 'destination retail and dining.' I think that atmosphere would fit Branson very well. They would just need to get a great show in there. That would provide people with a great place to eat, enjoy a show, shop, and hit a few rides. I think they could pull it off very well.
What a shame that the newest theme parks all seem to be failing. Closing this park seems consistent with Herschend's new strategy of diversifying to different markets (read: Valdosta, GA) instead of building up investment in any one location. It's a little surprising, though, that the only park in the chain to receive a new attraction next year is Wild Adventures. I'd love to see the rides spread out across the chain, and in a blue sky world I'd love the wooden coaster to make its way down to south Georgia.
I've been meaning to make it to Celebration City. The Main Street theme always appeared to be attractive in a Walt Disney's hometown sort of way. I don't see them selling the land very quickly in this economy; perhaps that would signal some sort of hope. Also, announcing the park will close only a couple days before closing date seems this decision was made out of haste and was NOT a part of any long term strategy.
Post a Comment