NewsPlusNotes Terms of Use
NewsPlusNotes is not affiliated with nor do we purport to represent
the views, interests, intentions, or policies of any park, corporation,
or entity. The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the
individual writers. While we strive to achieve 100% accuracy in our
news reporting, errors inevitably will occur from time to time and we
make no guarantees that the facts presented in any given post will
remain unchanged over time. For complete, up-to-the-minute information
on any park, please visit that park's web site or contact the park directly.
All original content found on NewsPlusNotes, including but not limited to
all original written content, the NewsPlusNotes logo and all other static
graphic and web design elements comprising the site, and all photos from
NewsPlusNotes writers' personal collections, is the exclusive property of
the NewsPlusNotes team and may not be used, reproduced, or distributed in
any manner without the express written consent of the individual author/creator.
All non-original content found on NewsPlusNotes, including but not limited
to park logos, press releases, and photo contributions received from parks,
corporations, and individual readers, remains the property of the original
author/creator and may be subject to additional copyright, trademark, and/or
intellectual property protection. The lack of an explicit copyright notice
does not imply ownership by NewsPlusNotes or any of its writers unless the
content in question has been produced by one of our team members as described
in the paragraph above. NewsPlusNotes occasionally features guest writers,
and these individuals retain ownership of all original written and/or graphic
content that they publish on NewsPlusNotes. By contributing written or graphic
material to NewsPlusNotes, you are implying that you are the owner of this
material or are submitting it with the express consent of the owner. If you
feel that we've made an error or omission in attributing proper credit to a
particular piece of content found on NewsPlusNotes, please contact us and we
will gladly investigate the matter and make any necessary corrections.
CLOSE
And it's bright white! Beautiful, wonderful, glowing white! I know I said it before but I think B&M track looks snazzy white.
2 comments:
It looks like a pretty fun coaster. Although, I'll never figure out why it needed a mid-course brake run. Since the track after the MCBR is one turn, one corkscrew, and another turn, it hardly seems worth the expense of the hardware. And since I've hardly ever seen a coaster crew dispatch trains quickly enough for three-train operations without stacking, the MCBR seems superfluous. I wish they had just put in a nice air-time hill instead. Just my two cents.
So true ... aside from adding a 3rd train there's no point IMO as well. It's been a while since the days of the big B&Ms that used 3 trains.
Heck, most parks stack two trains on coasters, the park must be ambitious to want to use three. Most parks have no interest in paying all that cash for a 3rd train to even be built.
Post a Comment